KALI MAAAAAA!!! You know when the guy gets lowered into the lava and he keeps going “Om nama shivaye, om nama shivaye, om nama shivaye…” That’s like a pretty common chant here, a guy singing it is the ringtone on a couple of friends’ phones. It basically means praise God, or praise Shiva. Om nama shivaye…
Did you know, India is a very religious country, I feel guilty telling people I don’t belong to one. I was in the elevator the other day and this lady I was sharing it with introduced herself and off the bat asked if I was a Catholic, I said no, she said, “Anglican?”
“<shifting weight> No…”
“What denomination are you?”
“No denomination really.”
“Achaa, so you’re just a Christian.”
“Ah, I’m not in a religion.”
“… So… religion does not interest you at all?”
“No no, I love religion! It’s fascinating.”
“<beat> I am a Hindu.”
“Cool.”
Religion religion. The more I travel and the more different people I meet and different religions I see, the more I come back to agnosticism, and I can’t help feeling like it’s such a cop out. In “Life of Pi” the narrator says of agnosticism that “choosing doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation.” But there are so many different religions, and the vast majority of people belong to their religion because of the family they’re born into. And if they don’t belong to their family’s religion, they belong to another religion that they would have been converted to because of meeting some missionary by random chance, or by picking up a book on religion that they happened to have seen by random chance, or they happened to have a stimulating conversation with a friend on religion, but they wouldn’t have had that conversation if it hadn’t led there, if they’d been someone else.
I don’t think we have free will, there. Where we’re born determines who we are, and we don’t decide where we’re born, so we don’t decide who we are. Whatever religion someone is a part of, no matter how strongly they believe in the truth of that religion, there’s a lot of people that believe in an entirely different religion with the same certainty. I mean, it’s not like you can say that those people belonging to different faiths just haven’t thought it through as much as you have. Maybe not all of them have, but there are definitely very smart and analytical people in every religion. There are a lot of smart people out there, smarter than me, who have tremendous, unshakeable faith in Christ, and a lot of other smart people, smarter than me, who have tremendous faith in Allah, or Krishna, or Joseph Smith, or Meher Baba. And they all follow their faiths because of the lives they’ve led. If they’d led a different life, they’d be someone else. If you believe that there’s a God who has a path laid out for you and that nothing that happens is random, then I can see how you could disagree, but remember why you believe that in the first place. The only reason I believe this is because I was born into my family and have had the influences that I’ve had. When we’re born, we’re a blank slate, right?
If God were all-understanding, He wouldn’t cast someone into Hell because they were born into the family of a different religion, raised to have the temperament of someone who would reject other faiths. Although in the Qu’ran there’s a part in Surah 2:2 that says, “Behold, as for those who are bent on denying the truth – it is all one to them whether thou warnest them or dost not warn them: they will not believe. God has sealed their hearts and their hearing, and over their eyes is a veil; and awesome suffering awaits them.” So, God purposely made them unwilling to accept faith? He sealed their hearts and ordained that they wouldn’t become Muslims in anticipation of punishing them? I don’t get it. There’s a lot of stuff I don’t get. I just think maybe a good way to bring peace between people is to say, “If I were you, I’d be you.”
“The Wise Heart” is a pretty good book by Buddhist psychologist
Jack Kornfield, in it he says, (the emphasis is mine) “A mature psychology requires us to view life from multiple perspectives… A mature life requires an ability to enter each of the roles given to us. Freedom arises when we hold them lightly, when we see them for what they are… You have so many views and opinions, what is good and bad, right and wrong, about how things should be. You cling to your views and suffer so much. They are only views, you know… when we believe our own thoughts and opinions we become fundamentalists. But no matter how strongly we believe our perspective, there are always other points of view. Learn to hold your thoughts lightly.”
I wish I could say I didn’t get this from a Wikipedia article, but it’s sound: “Religious persons acquire religious ideas and practices through social exposure. The child of a Zen Buddhist will not become an evangelical Christian or a Zulu warrior without the relevant cultural experience. While mere exposure does not cause a particular religious outlook (a person may have been raised a Roman Catholic but leave the church), nevertheless some exposure seems required – this person will never invent Roman Catholicism out of thin air.” Richard Dawkins calls religion “inherited tradition,” and forgive the excessive quoting, particularly from a bigot like Richard Dawkins, but other people are more articulate than me. In “Viruses of the Mind”:
“If you have a faith, it is statistically overwhelmingly likely that it is the same faith as your parents and grandparents had. No doubt soaring cathedrals, stirring music, moving stories and parables, help a bit. But by far the most important variable determining your religion is the accident of birth. The convictions that you so passionately believe would have been a completely different, and largely contradictory, set of convictions, if only you had happened to be born in a different place.”
Hurr, I can use Wikiquote. Mind you, I don’t conform to Dawkins’s “evangelical atheism,” he’s only an atheist because of where he was born as well, and I’ve met as many blockheaded atheists as I have religious folk. He claims to have reason and logic on his side, but I’ve seen God proved and disproved with logic so many times I’ve been convinced it’s a pointless way to try to understand His existence, or non-. For example, in the comments of some YouTube video (it’s a fun place to see people argue), I saw a Christian argue that the reason nothing needs to have created God is that God created the universe and all the laws that govern it, including gravity, thermodynamics, and the rule that something needs to have been created in order to exist – but God doesn’t exist within the confines of these rules he put in the framework of His universe, just as a painter doesn’t exist within his painting. That’s a pretty logical argument. Logically speaking, the deaths of innocent people shouldn’t bother me, because Earth will likely eventually explode with overpopulation and resource depletion, so the planet needs the amount of humans to be as low as possible. I mean, logic can only get you so far – the Life of Pi guy said reason is fool’s gold. Death and violence still bothers me, as natural as some people say they are. Others say that such feelings, the rejection of violence, that the existence of empathy or a conscience, come from God, but I don’t think we should sell humans short by arguing we wouldn’t be nice without some external force willing it. I think compassion might be an intrinsic human trait, however deeply buried it might be in a lot of people. Maybe it’s an extrapolated form of the evolutionary drive to protect your family? But what the hell do I know, I’m an unemployed twentysomething with a French degree.
Ultimately, the footprint you leave outweighs what you believe. Just be nice and don’t be a dick to people who are different, which is everyone. Respect how much like them you could be. No one’s better than anyone else, right?
This has been an unapologetically blog-like blog. I apologise. Now if you’ll excuse me, all this talk has made me hungry.
Back to aging.


The boys were rowdy but enthusiastic, we didn’t get through half the activities we’d planned but it was very good and we had a nice chat with the guys that run the place afterwards. Don Bosco, the orphange, like a lot of charitable and humanitarian organizations in India is Christian, owing to Christianity being the dominant religion in the West and the fact that the West has most of the money in the world, so they can afford to set up such places in India. So a lot of schools and orphanages and such are Christian here, but the children who attend them are never Christian and don’t become Christian, because proselytism, trying to convert people to other religions, is illegal in India, something I’ve always thought is pretty cool and respectful. So instead of running around trying to convince people they’re unhappy and telling everyone they’re sinners to get them to convert, all any religion can do to make people convert to their religion is just be really nice and non-preachy and active in their community and hope that their example will make people want to convert of their own accord. Father Roger, the (Indian) head of the orphanage said that sometimes undercover cops walk into a church/mosque/temple and say they want to convert, and when the priest says OK the cops go all “Ha! See? This guy is trying to convert people!” and get him in trouble, so even if someone comes up to you trying to convert to your religion you have to tell them that it’s a big decision and they should think about it for a while and the priest/imam/shenme shenme will interview you a few times and find out about you and who you are and everything before letting you convert. Does this law make a lot of sense to anyone else?





As the sun lowered before the ceremony started, Indian pop music played over the loudspeakers and a lot of people (actually invited by the guards) came down and danced unselfconsciously in the path leading to the gate – it appears that it’s not just religious festivals that call for public dancing in India, people seem to just like public dancing! I love it.
Teotihuacan
Palenque, I think.









